Quick internet search but I'm assuming this is the bill limiting what unions could spend their money on in which case 100% with you, booooo for that bill.
The bill I was referring to is a provincial bill in Ontario. It's an omnibus bill that does a bunch of bad things including:
- allowing for the privatization of municipal water supplies.
- giving the provincial government powers to block the construction of new bike lanes. (Which should fall under municipal powers since bike lanes are on municipal roads, not inter-city highways. But our current Premier is fond of ripping powers away from municipalities and consolidating them unto himself. He's also weirdly anti-cyclist.)
- stripping important protections away from residential tenants, including stripping from us the right to presumption of innocence. (Which should be a human rights violation under Canadian law. But this did not stop our Provincial government from passing the bill.)
- giving even more power and privilege to landlords in a system which already heavily favoured landlords, and provided largely toothless protections to tenants, in a rental market in which residential rents are already outrageously high (my own rent is greater than 2/3 of my total annual expenses!), waiting lists for affordable housing are up to ten years long, and every city in the province now has homeless encampments. (The number of Ontario citizens experiencing homelessness has almost quadrupled under the leadership of our current Premier.)
I don't think this particular piece of legislation attacks unions. But I could be wrong. The Conservatives crammed a bunch of things into it, and then rammed it through the Legislature without committee hearings or public consultation, and with extremely limited debate, in efforts to create overwhelm and rush the legislation through before Ontario voters could notice just how horrible the thing is.
I think Australia is fairly similar to Canada politically, a right wing party (not as right as USA) and another party which people think of as left wing in comparison but aren't really, and that aren't very inspiring/progressive but "at least they're not as bad as the other party".
We have three main national parties in Canada: the Conservatives, the Liberals, and the New Democratic Party. We also have the Bloc Québécois, which only runs candidates in Québec, and the Green Party, which has, for several elections now, succeeded in electing one MP.
Since the Bloc's support is concentrated solely within a small percentage of ridings, they elect an oversized number of MPs relative to their popular support. Since they only run candidates in slightly less than 23% of our total ridings, they pretty much can never form the Government. They do, however, usually elect enough MPs to have official party status in our House of Commons, and once they actually formed the Official Opposition.
We also have fringe parties, some of which are very scary, some of which are just ridiculous (we have a "Rhinoceros Party" which promises, if elected, not to keep any of its political promises), and some of which are single-issue parties that just don't attract enough interest to be relevant. None of them currently have any electable candidates under our FPtP electoral system.
Of the five parties which can currently elect MPs to our federal Parliament, the Liberals, NDP, Bloc, and Greens are all considered left-of-centre, and the Conservatives are right-of-centre. How far left or right shifts around, depending on who is the party leader at any given moment.
Generally speaking, Conservatives in Canada have shifted further right in recent decades, although this is not a linear progression. The current federal party leader is pretty far right, but his immediate predecessor was more centrist than the guy who preceded him. Though even the current Conservative leader (Pierre Poilievre) is not as far right as the current Republican Party in the US. (Our Conservative Party, for instance, would not try to pass legislation restricting women's access to reproductive health care. There are some people in this country who would support such legislation. But not nearly enough for anti-choice legislation to pass here. Also: a
very large majority of Canadians like our single-payer universal healthcare and think our southern neighbours are nuts for refusing to enact similar legislation in their own country.)
Also generally speaking, our NDP is further left than our Liberal Party. However, the Liberal Party has generally shifted to the left in recent decades. So it's now closer to the NDP than it used to be. In 2015, when Tom Mulcair was leader of the NDP, and Justin Trudeau leader of the Liberals, the Liberals were arguably more left than the NDP. Currently, however, under the leadership of Mark Carney, the Liberals have shifted back towards the centre. Also: the NDP had their worst showing ever in this year's election and did not elect enough members to have official party status in our current Parliament. (Yet they still have some negotiating power because the Liberal Party is just two seats shy of a majority, and the NDP have enough seats to push them over the top.)
It's interesting times we are living in, to be sure!
I dunno, I've only got a limited understanding of Canadian politics but you don't have preferential voting right? So basically it's vote for a major party or throw your vote away?
Correct. Our electoral system, provincially and federally, is first-past-the-post.
The city in which I live now actually used a ranked ballot in their last municipal election. But our beloved Premier has since enacted legislation to ban this. (Yet another example of his stomping all over matters which should be municipal--not provincial--concerns.)
There's been a bunch of similar rallies in Australia recently, which is pretty concerning.
I am sorry. This type of behaviour is on the rise in many places these days. It is concerning.
(Deleted a rant about how the police treat white nationalist protests vs other protests. Not the place AGAIN!)
In the case of the event I posted about above, the protesters' behaviour did not rise to a level that would warrant police intervention. They were standing on a sidewalk. They did not disrupt vehicular or (as far as I know) pedestrian traffic. Their signage was certainly hateful, but did not cross the boundary into what would be defined as criminal hate speech in Canada. These groups engage in a lot of activities which are designed to be threatening without actually landing any of the group members in jail.
So many plans!!! Seriously impressed - do you thrive off setting high goals and find it motivating? Or maybe it just looks like high goals to me and this is normal for you?
I do find challenging goals motivating, yes. If I set goals which are too easy, I won't take them seriously.
All of the goals I've set for myself for the next month are things I have achieved before. So I know I
can do them. (I've not used this specific list of mini workouts before. But I have pretty religiously followed a schedule of taking regular breaks from sitting to do physical exercise at various times in the past. This practice has a large positive effect, is not that difficult for me to maintain, and is becoming even more important for me to do as I age.)
I set goals for fun at the start of the year but don't really pressure myself to do them. But for me I find easy-to-achieve goals motivate me more; if I set high goals I end up in an all-or-nothing mindset where one stuff-up ruins any motivation.
I see failure as a normal part of life, and an opportunity for growth. I likely will mess up on some of my goals from time to time. But this is okay. I can fail this week but still succeed next week. Also: I've structured my December plans with a lot of small goals. I will need to work hard to meet all of them. But I will almost definitely achieve some of them. So I will end the month with at least some wins. Which will feel good, even if I don't achieve a perfect score.
Good luck with your December plans!
Thank you.
Also appreciate the weight stuff being in a spoiler. I mean, it's your thread you can format weight talk however you like. But just wanted to comment on it - my partner has a history of eating disorders so whenever I see people putting weight talk in spoilers I like to show appreciation
Thank you. As you say, here on DAREBEE we have broad freedom to write about what we like in our personal threads. Other Bees can choose to follow my thread or not, as they like. But I know many people are sensitive to talk about weight who might otherwise want to read about and cheer on other aspects of my fitness journey. I do not want to alienate these Bees from following my thread. Hence the use of spoilers.